Dealing outliers offsets radiocarbon dating

26 Mar

To state that climate change will be ‘catastrophic’ hides a cascade of value-laden assumptions which do not emerge from empirical or theoretical science,” Hulme wrote.Lindzen singled out Secretary of State John Kerry for his ‘ignorance’ on science. “Kerry expresses his ignorance of what science is,” he added.: 'Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.' - 'When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. ' AUSTIN, Texas – A team of prominent scientists gathered in Texas today at a climate summit to declare that fears of man-made global warming were “irrational” and “based on nonsense” that “had nothing to do with science.” They warned that “we are being led down a false path” by the upcoming UN climate summit in Paris. This is a very tiny change period.' : 'Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian.The scientists appeared at a climate summit sponsored by the Texas Public Policy Foundation.The summit in Austin was titled: “At the Crossroads: Energy & Climate Policy Summit.” Climate Scientist Dr. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences at MIT, derided what he termed climate “catastrophism.” “Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial,” Lindzen said. “We are speaking of small changes 0.25 Celsius would be about 51% of the recent warming and that strongly suggests a low and inconsequential climate sensitivity – meaning no problem at all,” Lindzen explained.

Grains of pollen, flax and cotton fibers, mites, spores and fungi, mineral particles and particles related to body fluids were detected and classified.You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. And it’s a good thing since it is at very low levels in the atmosphere. Happer then showed a picture of polluted air in China with the caption: “Real pollution in Shanghai.” “If you can see it, it’s not CO2,” Happer said. “We know for absolute certain that carbon dioxide is the stuff of life, the foundation for life on earth,” Moore said.“If plants could vote, they would vote for coal,” Happer declared. “97% of scientists have often been wrong on many things,” he said. Patrick Moore discussed the benefits of rising carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. “We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science,” he continued.“When someone points to this and says this is the warmest temperature on record. If you can adjust temperatures to 2/10ths of a degree, it means it wasn’t certain to 2/10ths of a degree,” he said.() “The UN IPCC wisely avoided making the claim that 51% of a small change in temperature constitutes a problem.