Non sedating anti psychotics

01 Dec

Higher doses were associated with worse outcomes than lower ones.These days neuroleptic drugs are widely promoted to treat depression and they are often used “off-label” to treat behavioral problems in children.A Medical, not a Psychosocial Framework The consequences of applying this predominantly medical model to a population that would benefit from a broader psychosocial approach are significantly deleterious.

non sedating anti psychotics-48non sedating anti psychotics-72

The use of anti-psychotics as a first-line intervention for difficult behaviors is declining, but it remains too prevalent, and when anti-psychotics are reduced or eliminated, most long-term-care facilities lack a non-pharmacological behavioral intervention to support residents.They are among the most widely prescribed drugs; given the theory that “schizophrenia” affects 1% of the population, it is clear that many individuals – adults and children – who do not have this diagnosis are prescribed these drugs.Is the Wunderink study relevant to those who do not experience psychosis?The Wunderink study has been discussed here in other blogs (here, here, and here).In brief, using a randomized control design, Wunderink found that in adults diagnosed with a psychotic disorder continuous use of neuroleptics was associated with worse functional outcomes than intermittent use.