Redating an ex years later dating services salt lake city

20 May

Visitors to her famous temple can still see where Thutmosis’s workmen carefully chiseled away her image from the walls of the structure.A few decades afterwards, the ruling priests eliminated virtually all possible traces of the teachings of Pharaoh Akhenaten, who had introduced what they considered to be heretical Egyptian religious reforms.Archaeology is, in fact, a limited and imperfect area of study in which the interpretation of findings, as archaeologists readily admit, is more of an art than a hard science.Considering not only the limits but also the positive side of archaeology, it is remarkable how many Biblical accounts have been illuminated and confirmed by the relatively small number of sites excavated and finds uncovered to date.We should not be surprised, then, that some critics have focused so much attention on this fundamental event in the Bible.They try to discredit the story of the Exodus to undermine its historical validity.Besides these limits of archaeology, an additional problem exists that is seldom noted—the ever-present scholarly bias.It takes only a brief reading of archaeological journals to witness how alive and well human nature is among many of the experts.

Some time later Pharaoh Thutmosis III destroyed virtually all records relating to Queen Hatshepsut, the previous ruler, whom he despised.This would have embarrassed them in front of the entire known world.It’s more natural to believe they simply licked their wounds and tried to cover up all traces of this humiliating national episode, especially since they are known to have done this on other occasions.We find that Jesus Christ affirmed the Biblical account of the Exodus as true, and He based some of His teachings on it.Reminding His countrymen that God had miraculously provided food for them during 40 years in the wilderness, He said: Your forefathers ate the manna in the desert, yet they died.